Do you even overland, bruh?

Hulk

RS Webmaster
Staff member
Moderator
Cruise Moab Committee
Joined
Aug 22, 2005
Messages
16,538
Location
Centennial
Sure, you carry a jack, but is your jack an "off-road" jack? Get a jack with bigger wheels and a lift, bruh!

Please note that this is not a bolt on wheel kit. This jack does not have standard wheels and cannot be converted to a standard jack. It is built at our factory as a big wheel monster.

Screen Shot 2021-10-01 at 9.31.56 AM.png
 

DaveInDenver

Rising Sun Ham Guru
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
13,137
Location
Grand Junction
Sure, you carry a jack, but is your jack an "off-road" jack? Get a jack with bigger wheels and a lift, bruh!

Please note that this is not a bolt on wheel kit. This jack does not have standard wheels and cannot be converted to a standard jack. It is built at our factory as a big wheel monster.

View attachment 98605
You mustn't have had to work on a car on gravel.

Or my 100 year old driveway with it's mini pot holes and deteriorating cement.

Not so much the jacking per se but moving it around on imperfect surfaces. Yeah, I can actually see the benefit.

If you want to see frustration imagine rolling under your truck and the tiny wheels of your creeper hitting a rock as you slide down it, your back finding the splinters. Ugh. An overland creeper. Now that's something I'd be interested in.
 

DouglasVB

Rising Sun Member
Joined
May 5, 2015
Messages
2,181
Location
People's Soviet Socialist Republic of California,
But can it fit 35" without rubbing? 🤔
 

Hulk

RS Webmaster
Staff member
Moderator
Cruise Moab Committee
Joined
Aug 22, 2005
Messages
16,538
Location
Centennial
Soft Shackle Receiver Adapter $84

Screen Shot 2022-03-08 at 2.37.38 PM.png
 
Last edited:

Inukshuk

Rising Sun Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Messages
7,312
Location
Denver, CO
Its not terrible. I would like to see a Working Load Limit for the aluminum, and Working Load Limit and MTS (Minimum Tensile Strength) or MBS (Minimum Breaking Strength for the soft shackle. However, the hitch pin is really carrying the load here while the aluminum is just providing a nice radiused surface for the soft shackle. Good that the soft shackle can be removed and used elsewhere.
Downsides: 1) it does only one job, 2) pin locations vary on receivers so it is possible that the AL part ends up recessed on some, which would be bad. OK if it sticks out a bit.
 

DaveInDenver

Rising Sun Ham Guru
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
13,137
Location
Grand Junction
That soft shackle adapter is made by a person who goes by Metcalf on Expedition Portal.


A 5/8" grade 5 pin has a single shear strength of 22,000 lbf so in double shear it's at least 2x that.

Looks to me like a solution trying to find a problem.
 

damon

Vice Commander
Cruise Moab Committee
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
1,130
Location
Arvada, CO
That soft shackle adapter is made by a person who goes by Metcalf on Expedition Portal.


A 5/8" grade 5 pin has a single shear strength of 22,000 lbf so in double shear it's at least 2x that.

Looks to me like a solution trying to find a problem.

Agreed. There is no reason for this when a traditional shackle serves the purpose. Also, people tend to leave these in, subjecting the soft shackle to the elements, wearing down its life.
 

damon

Vice Commander
Cruise Moab Committee
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
1,130
Location
Arvada, CO
Sure, you carry a jack, but is your jack an "off-road" jack? Get a jack with bigger wheels and a lift, bruh!

Please note that this is not a bolt on wheel kit. This jack does not have standard wheels and cannot be converted to a standard jack. It is built at our factory as a big wheel monster.

View attachment 98605
I feel like 2 ton is not enough for a typical offroad rig.
 

Notyourmomslx450

Cruise Moab Committee
Cruise Moab Committee
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
3,293
Location
Westminster
I feel like 2 ton is not enough for a typical offroad rig.
nothing typical about 80's. 2ton is more than enough for mini trucks, 4runners, jeeps etc.....
a 3 ton would be nice for the 80 though.
 

DaveInDenver

Rising Sun Ham Guru
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
13,137
Location
Grand Junction
Agreed. There is no reason for this when a traditional shackle serves the purpose. Also, people tend to leave these in, subjecting the soft shackle to the elements, wearing down its life.
Factor55 has a nice aluminum adapter for comparison. It's intended for a traditional bow shackle. They give it a WLL of 9500 lbs (so appropriate for a 3/4" or 4.75 ton) and design margin of roughly 5.3:1 at 51,000 lbf.


It's not 1:1 because Factor55's is traditional with the block of aluminum in tension while the one above the aluminum is in compression. So the material strength isn't as important to WLL as the pin and rope loop.

In tension I'd take steel over aluminum but in this case a big hunk of either isn't the problem. My suspicion is that in all cases the component that is most suspect is the soft shackle, meaning it's the most difficult to pin down to a WLL and be in known good condition.
 
Last edited:

AlpineAccess

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Nov 19, 2019
Messages
1,263
Location
Loveland
That soft shackle adapter is made by a person who goes by Metcalf on Expedition Portal.


A 5/8" grade 5 pin has a single shear strength of 22,000 lbf so in double shear it's at least 2x that.

Looks to me like a solution trying to find a problem.
I think that summarizes overlanding
 

damon

Vice Commander
Cruise Moab Committee
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
1,130
Location
Arvada, CO
Factor55 has a nice aluminum adapter for comparison. It's intended for a traditional bow shackle. They give it a WLL of 9500 lbs (so appropriate for a 3/4" or 4.75 ton) and design margin of roughly 5.3:1 at 51,000 lbf.


It's not 1:1 because Factor55's is traditional with the block of aluminum in tension while the one above the aluminum is in compression. So the material strength isn't as important to WLL as the pin and rope loop.

In tension I'd take steel over aluminum but in this case a big hunk of either isn't the problem. My suspicion is that in all cases the component that is most suspect is the soft shackle, meaning it's the most difficult to pin down to a WLL and be in known good condition.

Not sure where you are going with this. I made no mention of any metal to compare with/against. Did you mean to quote someone else?
 

mcgaskins

Rising Sun Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2012
Messages
1,901
Location
Denver, CO
A buddy sent me this today:

 

Hulk

RS Webmaster
Staff member
Moderator
Cruise Moab Committee
Joined
Aug 22, 2005
Messages
16,538
Location
Centennial

Inukshuk

Rising Sun Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Messages
7,312
Location
Denver, CO
FYI
Factor55 has a nice aluminum adapter for comparison. It's intended for a traditional bow shackle. They give it a WLL of 9500 lbs (so appropriate for a 3/4" or 4.75 ton) and design margin of roughly 5.3:1 at 51,000 lbf.
I just bought that one a few weeks ago.
My suspicion is that in all cases the component that is most suspect is the soft shackle, meaning it's the most difficult to pin down to a WLL and be in known good condition.
I just posted a few comments on that thread in Expo, specifically: "Do you also make the soft shackle? Your website says "ultimate breaking strength in excess of 40k pounds with a 3:1 safe Working Load Limit of over 6 tons." It is good to see a WLL based on a breaking strength divided by safety factor. That's good info many leave out of or are oblivious to. How are you / your manufacturer defining "ultimate breaking strength"? Is the rating on actual destructive testing of built shackles or derived from the rope used? Is the knot mechanically set? Will the soft shackles be labeled with the specifications so I can pick one up and know about it? If there is testing data, would you include it on the website / with product?"
 

Inukshuk

Rising Sun Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Messages
7,312
Location
Denver, CO
A buddy sent me this today:
I can see that serving a purpose for people who can't stop the winch run-on when stowing, but if all you have is the loop, who cares if it gets pulled through the fairlead. Safely reach in and pull it out next tiime you need to deploy.

Now for real Hawse - style innovation see https://hawsepro.com/ from the same family who created the Pull-Pall. I have spoken with creator Max Gremillion and many in our circle know him personally. Its legit. For the person who must have a hawse profile (some bumpers only fit hawse style) and realizes that rollers are always better. You pay for it though.
 

DaveInDenver

Rising Sun Ham Guru
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
13,137
Location
Grand Junction
Not sure where you are going with this. I made no mention of any metal to compare with/against. Did you mean to quote someone else?
Kind of multiple threads, actually was thinking of Daniel's post.
FYI

I just bought that one a few weeks ago.

I just posted a few comments on that thread in Expo, specifically: "Do you also make the soft shackle? Your website says "ultimate breaking strength in excess of 40k pounds with a 3:1 safe Working Load Limit of over 6 tons." It is good to see a WLL based on a breaking strength divided by safety factor. That's good info many leave out of or are oblivious to. How are you / your manufacturer defining "ultimate breaking strength"? Is the rating on actual destructive testing of built shackles or derived from the rope used? Is the knot mechanically set? Will the soft shackles be labeled with the specifications so I can pick one up and know about it? If there is testing data, would you include it on the website / with product?"
I just was over there reading his reply.

"Soft shackle rating. Doing an 'official' soft shackle rating is not something I want to get into. I've done both destructive testing and a LOT of real world testing. Since every unit is slightly unique in it's construction, it just isn't practical. You can stick a pretty tag on it, but it doesn't really mean much in my opinion. I use quality materials and quality construction methods, including a high force setting of the top knot, and that is as far as I want to go down the rabbit hole. If you need a fancy tag, just buy them elsewhere if that makes you feel more comfortable. There is not a higher quality soft shackle on the market at this price point in my opinion. I do this because I enjoy it, I am not trying to sell millions to the military or something. Soft Shackles, just like their steel cousins, are for all intents a wear item. We aren't logging and tracking every pull or lift on them. Most people have never used a load cell during a recovery. They do wear. They are often abused. They should be inspected and retired as required."

So the gist is "Trust me, I know what I'm doing. But don't actually put me on the hook for anything."

There's design and test standards that apply and installed tags indicating compliance to them aren't just cosmetic. Like the Cordage Institute (what a bunch of chumps, they've only been around 102 years and represent the manufacturers) and their 5:1 to 12:1 recommended design factor.

Cordage Institute International Guideline CI 1401-19 - Safer Use of Fiber Rope

CI1401.png
 
Last edited:

Corbet

RS Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Messages
8,055
Location
Durango, Colorado
Soft Shackle Receiver Adapter $84

View attachment 102683

I’m pretty sure this guy is from Durango but yet to meet him.
 

Inukshuk

Rising Sun Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Messages
7,312
Location
Denver, CO
Top