California Emissions?

SteveH

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
3,219
Location
Colo Springs

Giovanni

Lifted
Joined
Apr 9, 2017
Messages
122
Location
Broomfield
Hmm interesting. My time in Colorado is becoming very limited by such things. Also interesting how states enacted similar laws and then reversed them later. Most solutions that are being implemented to fight emissions are destroying vehicles, such as DEF. I'm happy to have two vehicles with zero emissions equipment and they run beautifully.
 

J Kimmel

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
1,779
Location
Glenwood Springs CO
what is it something like 1% of vehicles tested actually fail?

hey its something like 50 million a year in revenue, makes sense to expand it
 

Stuckinthe80s

Rising Sun Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2017
Messages
2,389
Location
Lakewood, CO
what is it something like 1% of vehicles tested actually fail?

hey its something like 50 million a year in revenue, makes sense to expand it


So I'm part of the 1%? I thought that meant I was supposed to be uber wealthy.
 

OilHammer

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
1,782
Location
Denver
Why have emission laws when you can just salt the roads? The old cars will just rot away and eventually be gone. ;)
 

nattybumppo

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
1,395
Location
Northwest Denver

powderpig

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Aug 25, 2005
Messages
1,527
Adrian, Def does not do harm to the engine. It is post engine, and is not injected into the engine.
but the EGR, PCV systems is on most modern diesels. That is what does the harm.

As for this notice, we have been under California emissions stuff for a while now, it was just adopted in a different manor, now it really under those tight CARB rules. Just suck to have a lot of people in one small place driving slow(bumper to bumper traffic)when the engine is not at it peak performance for getting good emissions and fuel economy.
 

AxleIke

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Apr 20, 2006
Messages
4,747
Location
Broomfield, CO
You can move outside of Jefferson, Denver, Boulder, Broomfield, etc.. counties. Weld, for example, doesn't require emissions. Nor does Park.

The part I love, is what Robbie is getting at. Colorado residents refuse time and again to invest in infrastructure or effective mass transit (like trains, not buses). More and more people move here and clog up roads designed for half our population. So of course we have emissions problems. Everyone is bumper to bumper and going nowhere every single day.

So instead we get this.

However, I think the "emissions issues" are really just a smoke screen. This whole thing has been going on around the country in various different forms as various governors try to give the finger to the current administration and the deregulation of the EPA. This is just more of the same. The EPA has been removing regulations on emissions so states get it in their heads to increase the regulations in spite. The political equivalent of sticking your tongue out and spitting at each other across the back seat.
 

nuclearlemon

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Aug 23, 2005
Messages
8,751
Location
windy wyo
Weld county does require testing in certain areas. :(
 

OilHammer

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Apr 2, 2009
Messages
1,782
Location
Denver
Interesting Calif. emission story: https://www.hemmings.com/stories/th...-garage-to-change-california-car-law-forever/

Would that some sanity would come to Colorado along these lines.
It’s a step but a 1,000 mile annual cap is ridiculously low. Why not 3,000? If you take an average cars annual mileage and figure out how many miles you would drive on Saturdays and sundays for a year, it’s 3 to 3500 per year. A 1k is a joke unless you own three classics you rotate through. If that’s the way they want it, then give me one tag and liability insurance I can rotate through the fleet. I can only drive one at a time so why register and insure all the same?
 
Back
Top