This is why we don't need diesels...

TacoDane

Rising Sun Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
423
Location
Arvada
I love that little 4bt pickup.

I had big aspirations to 4bt my 1500 Ram but never scraped together enough loose change.
The 5.9 that's going in will spice it up though. Was a 5.2 which new is 230hp/295 ftlbs @ 4000rpm. It's getting a rebuilt 5.9 that should push over 250hp/ 350 ftlbs @ 3250rpm or less. The higher power at lower RPMs is crucial with Dodges gearing.
 

Hulk

RS Webmaster
Staff member
Moderator
Cruise Moab Committee
Joined
Aug 22, 2005
Messages
16,455
Location
Centennial
Diesel drivers who are “rolling coal” in Colorado: Tune up or pay up
State lawmakers called practice mean

Diesel pickup truck drivers in Colorado who illegally tweak their engines to blast out black smoke can now be fined $100 for the practice.

By BRUCE FINLEY | bfinley@denverpost.com | The Denver Post
PUBLISHED: May 22, 2017 at 12:53 am | UPDATED: May 22, 2017 at 3:37 pm

Colorado is riding hard on diesel truck drivers who “roll coal,” the politically charged display of power on the roads that has doused other vehicles, such as environmentally friendly Priuses, and pedestrians, including supporters of presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, with sooty black smoke.

Gov. John Hickenlooper this week said he’ll gladly sign into law a bill lawmakers passed that lets police hit offenders with $100 fines.

“Coal rolling is a cruel cut to people with asthma or other respiratory issues,” Hickenlooper said. “We are well to be rid of it.”

Over the past three years, the practice emerged as a way to have fun at the expense of other people, and air quality that is already compromised in parts of Colorado. Diesel pickup truck drivers illegally tweak their engines — tampering with pollution controls and enabling intake of extra fuel — so that by stepping on their accelerator pedals they can blast out spectacularly foul fumes.

New Jersey has outlawed rolling coal.

But Colorado lawmakers, facing anxieties in agricultural areas, wrestled with legislative proposals and twice killed them before passing the bill this month. Police had pushed for a law that could let them crack down. The police occasionally have been targets of the smoke, Fort Collins Police Lt. Craig Horton said.

“We have problems with that display of exhaust, especially on our weekend nights when we have a cruising issue,” Horton said.

Among those embracing the crackdown is Dana TePoel, owner of Lake Arbor Automotive & Truck in Westminster, who for 25 years has conducted state-mandated emissions tests on diesel vehicles for license renewals. Of 52 tests done on diesel vehicles this past week, seven failed.

About a dozen of the trucks that fail emissions tests at his shop each year have engines altered for rolling coal and are usually brought in by drivers new to Colorado.

“We tell ’em they have to fix it,” he said, noting that the modifications can cost thousands of dollars and that coal rollers who fail emissions tests typically must turn back to people who made the illegal modifications to undo them.

TePoel called the $100 fines “a good addition to the system of prevention, emissions testing, that is already in place.”

Trouble hit rolling coal drivers along Colorado’s Front Range when outdoor restaurant patrons and pedestrians complained. Fort Collins police initially tried to use anti-drag racing laws that allow cops to pull over drivers for exhibitions of speed and power, a jailable offense. Police also found it was hard to enforce existing laws prohibiting tampering with pollution control devices.

State Rep. Joann Ginal. D-Fort Collins, was among those smoked. And last fall, when a line of people formed at the New Belgium Brewery to see a campaign event featuring former President Bill Clinton, Ginal said, plume-producing trucks hit them hard.

Hickenlooper’s signature cannot come too soon, she said.

A few days after she and Sen. Don Coram, R-Montrose, secured final passage of the bill, Ginal was driving in Fort Collins behind a tan pickup truck with Texas license plates. The driver smoked her. Ginal said she had a feeling her state lawmaker license plates made her a target.

“They do it to people in Priuses, people on motorcycles, and people just walking down the streets. Some are older people who have chronic respiratory conditions. The smoke makes it worse,” she said.

“It is mean. It is more young people who are doing this,” she said. “They think it is funny.”

It happens statewide, Coram said, citing incidents in Grand Junction and Durango.

A pregnant woman walking with a small child in Durango was hit, said Coram. She called his office to complain. Rolling coal isn’t a matter of political expression, he said.

Ginal introduced legislation in 2016 that died, and tried again this year. Her first bill failed as opponents, including Sen. Jerry Sonnenberg, R-Sterling, a rancher, raised concerns that a crackdown on coal rolling could lead to California-style emission standards for work trucks.

Coram revived the legislation, removing references to harassing behavior — which complicated enforcement — and inserting exceptions for commercial and agricultural vehicles.

Ginal said she expects lawmakers in other states will follow Colorado’s lead.

http://www.denverpost.com/2017/05/22/colorado-rolling-coal-fines/
 

J Kimmel

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
1,700
Location
Glenwood Springs CO
Thank goodness for more legislation so they'll finally be able to make these bullies pay.

Or they could just ticket them? Surely there is some sort of existing emissions or safety codes an officer can cite when issuing a ticket for excessive smoke.

Yay for more laws
 

DaveInDenver

Rising Sun Ham Guru
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
13,037
Location
Grand Junction
Thank goodness for more legislation so they'll finally be able to make these bullies pay.

Or they could just ticket them? Surely there is some sort of existing emissions or safety codes an officer can cite when issuing a ticket for excessive smoke.

Yay for more laws
There exist Federal laws for modifying emissions systems but apparently a cop has to attend a special school to be trained in enforcing those laws. I believe a state trooper could cite you for this but municipal cops aren't going to be qualified (so-to-speak) to enforce them. By making it a state-level vehicle infraction then any cop can cite you. There might be state laws for excessive smoke, not sure about that. But I think the point was to change it from a obscure vehicle emission rule to something more like basically a passive aggressive assault on other drivers and pedestrians.
 

J Kimmel

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
1,700
Location
Glenwood Springs CO
They've been ticketing people for a while for this in Montrose. There has to be something they're citing rather than just "gosh I wish I could ticket that rude guy for something "
 

DaveInDenver

Rising Sun Ham Guru
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
13,037
Location
Grand Junction
They've been ticketing people for a while for this in Montrose. There has to be something they're citing rather than just "gosh I wish I could ticket that rude guy for something "
Maybe defective vehicle, not sure. In the Front Range you can rat on excessively smoking vehicles to a state hotline.

BTW, this article mentions why it's been a difficult thing to enforce.

http://www.coloradoindependent.com/159114/rolling-coal-colorado

Blowing a cloud of black smoke from the tailpipes of a diesel-engine truck to annoy pedestrians and motorists is called rolling coal, and it’s a cultural pastime among a particular set of individual. The practice is also illegal in Colorado.

The trouble is police have a problem enforcing laws against it, according to law enforcement officers who testified in favor of a bill to help them better regulate what they see as a growing problem.

Currently, for cops to crack down on coal rollers, officers must be trained to discern the opacity of the smoke, and also observe it happening for a full five seconds.

...

Manipulating vehicles to make rolling coal easier has apparently become something of a cottage industry.

“I think we’ve all witnessed and seen the black smoke go up,” said Aurora Democratic Sen. Nancy Todd, at the April 26 hearing.

“Blowing thick black smoke from exhaust pipes is a serious public nuisance,” said Democratic Sen. John Kefalas of Fort Collins.

A Fort Collins police lieutenant testified in favor of the bill, saying, “It can blow up a whole intersection with black smoke in just a few seconds.” That’s why the bill is needed, he said, to help officers who aren’t trained be able to enforce the law and not have to wait a full five seconds before issuing a ticket.

Chris Johnson, who represents the County Sheriffs of Colorado, says the state’s sheriffs back the bill.

“I’ve seen this happen,” he said. “It is an issue.”
 

rover67

Rising Sun Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
9,317
Location
Boulder, Co
Hopefully we don't get called out for the Jetta. It smokes just a tad LOL.
 

J Kimmel

Hard Core 4+
Joined
Oct 25, 2005
Messages
1,700
Location
Glenwood Springs CO
Maybe defective vehicle, not sure. In the Front Range you can rat on excessively smoking vehicles to a state hotline.

BTW, this article mentions why it's been a difficult thing to enforce.

http://www.coloradoindependent.com/159114/rolling-coal-colorado

Seems like the new law is just as ambiguous to me?

They have to see it for 5 seconds before they can ticket and if this passes then they can just ticket for any smoke at all. That seems to open the doors for more problems. My truck is bone stock but at WOT on a hot day it'll smoke a little. Especially if I'm pulling a trailer. Now a ticket is solely at the discretion of an officer if he wants to ticket me or not.

I'm not advocating for coal rolling idiots by any means but boy it just opens it up for the rest of us to get hit with fines for using a completely stock truck for its intended purpose when the wrong cop sees you. Am I mistaken?
 

DaveInDenver

Rising Sun Ham Guru
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
13,037
Location
Grand Junction
I don't think you're mistaken Kimmel. The one argument I can see in favor might be that it marginalizes the EPA and Federal rules.
 

LARGEONE

Rising Sun Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
2,875
Location
Broomfield, CO
Just register your vehicle as a commercial vehicle and roll coal all you want :)
 

LandBruiser

Lifted
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
110
Location
Jefferson
Rolling coal on the street is ghey! It gives diesels a bad name. If a truck or car isn't stock and is tuned to smoke black (not gray) under anything but WOT or when towing up a steep grade it's not tuned right and is wasting fuel- not making power. Lots of black smoke during normal street driving is the sure sign of an incompetent mechanic/"tune" or a absolute moron.

Mine might have a good size puff if I punch it, but cleans up quick! To remedy excessive smoke it needs the fuel turned down, a better sized turbo(s), or a new bigger/clean air filter.
 

BritKLR

Rising Sun Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,212
Location
ATC HQ - Nederland, Colo.
I wouldn't be too worried about ticketing based on a momentary plume of smoke from a stock diesel in comparison to a rolling coal truck display. Night and day difference.
 
Top