You guys are helping with my lean toward the 200 (it's all just theory for me right now my junk all still works and $ is tight). My 2001 1st gen taco does not compare favorably quality wise when compared to a 1990 mini truck with twice the mileage. I can say that the frame on my 2001 Taco while OK and not going to fail in time for a warranty replacement has a lot more surface corrosion on it than the frame under my 100. I'm the second owner of the Taco (purchased 2004, 30kmi) and it was sold by our favorite dealer to a local. The 1990 had 200kmi and we were probably like the 5th owner (so it was beat but had better rubber, fabric, frame, etc). My 1999 100 has 225kmi, I'm at least the 3rd owner and it started out in Michigan so it should have the ugliest frame of the 3 but the Taco is currently looking a little worse at 125kmi (newest, lowest mileage, fewest owners, all Colorado, best maintained of the 3). So yeah, lets hope Gen 3 Taco is better in the frame rot department. Oh, and also Landcruiser!
Andy here is one man's comparison with his new 2016 Taco vs his '08 200 series.. And dave there is a mention about undercarriage spraying. I am definitely going to research that more. Nice 200 in these photos also.
https://www.tacomaworld.com/threads...r-my-impressions-so-far.417366/#post-11857705
Hi all, new to this forum but active on many other auto and enthusiast forums. I recently sold my 2008 Toyota Land Cruiser as I no longer needed the 8 passenger seating and I got tired of hauling firewood and hay in the back of it.
So, I traveled from TN to VA and found a 2016 Tacoma double cab, TRD OR with auto, roof rack, aluminum side steps and mud guards. Ironically its the same color, though the Tacoma's grey is darker (could be the LC's grey has faded some over the years or just a different shade)
While searching I told the dealers I didnt care about color as long as it wasnt Pastel, pink, Rainbow dash or something like that, just worked out that way I guess, anyhow I really love the color with the black interior (The LC has grey)
My impressions...
Engine / Trans / OR features
The Tacoma's engine is decent for a V6, I do miss the power of the 5.7 V8 coupled with fulltime 4wd, however I do not miss the mid/low teen fuel economy and 250 mile fillups. My fuel economy with the Tacoma has steadily improved from 17mpg to 20mpg average now that I am at 1000 miles. The transmission shifts smoother than the LC and the sport mode is more responsive (though I rarely use it). The V6 engine idles smooth and isnt very course, pulls well to redline and shifts well. The LC V8 also pulls well but is not as smooth over 5000 rpms.
So CRAWL, ATRAC, Center Diff Loc (no rear locker -weird for US Spec) - I used the heck out of it in my LandCruiser. Did a lot of offroading in Idaho + several trips to Moab with it. The 08 has the 3 speed crawl and compared to the new 5 speed one in the Tacoma its a dinosaur. It worked great, it was just insanely loud and more aggressive with the brakes compared to the Tacomas (which is still relatively loud) - basically its more herky-jerky. Low range, 4h all seem comparable but the Tacoma's approach and breakovers are much better. I havent gotten to really work out the Tacoma yet, but I definitely will - I feel confident in its abilities based on 2nd gen reviews.
Ride/Ergo
So yeah, the LC is like driving your couch. Comfy and quiet, soft, supple 8 way power seats, but the stock suspension on the LC is very soft. Even with KDSS it rolls heavily in any type of hard corners (like onramps). (even when stock)
The driveshafts in the LC clunk a lot when stopping or accelerating from a stop as well (known complaint) and the brakes in the LC are terrible. - it really should have gotten Tundra rotors. Pulling 8K with it even with brake controller was an exercise in swaying and pre-planned braking. The bushings squeak a lot and the windshield / wiper flutter will drive you insane at 80mph. The 3rd row seats in the LC shake, rattle and roll, pretty common in the 100's and 200's. The factory step bars in the LC are a joke, they flex and bend even when my 12 year old steps up on them so if you get an LC, get sliders asap. The rear receiver pin holes are too far back and its a PITA to remove the pin when stowing the draw bar.
The new entune is so much ahead of the NAV in the LC. Bluetooth music, ap suite, etc are leaps and bounds above the 1st gen 200 series. The rearview camera in the Tacoma is much clearer than the LC but that could be due to a higher quality screen vs the older LC.
Reliablity -
To early to tell on the Tacoma but so far been no issues. No trans hunting, weird wind noises or anything. Did fluid film on the undercarriage this week in case Toyota hasnt fully gotten a handle on the rust issue (though I believe it was fixed in 11 or 12)
LC - nearly 150K miles, many of them offroad. Cracked top of radiator (its plastic), leaking water pump replaced under warranty, driveshaft replaced under warranty. Besides that it was just oil changes/fluids, coolant at 100K, plugs at 120K. - 3 sets of tires, 2 complete brake changes. Everything worked and besides the rear seat rattle the interior fit and finish was tight and rattle free like new.
So here she is, so far I am thrilled and cant believe how awesome the aftermarket is for the Tacoma! - cant wait to get some mods going

- well did a 1.5" seat rise, but thats all so far.
Good bye old faithful
2.5" OME lift, 33" Duratracs